-
Mr. Robin, I get notified by e-mail when posts are made to a forum I moderate, you now own the record...my e-mail informed me your post was 26 whatevers, normally they come in at one or two.
It is extremely rude to the browsers of this forum to continue an argument that was started on another forum...
One must start anew, and deal only with content that is presented here.
Mr. Robin, I must strongly disagree about nerual connectivity being the greatest at age 25.
It is common knowledge that the peak of brain activity and intelligence is between 35-45 years of age.
Perhaps the 25 year old THINKS they are the smartest, but they surely are not.
------------------
Alex
[This message has been edited by Alex (edited December 13, 2001).]
-
There is a differance between neural connectivety, and neural activety.
You might have the max. number present, but that doesn't state that all of them are working all at once.
From the scientific studies that I have done, and if required, I can find references to the works, max connectivety is at around 25 years of age.
Max connectivety does NOT imply max.
intelligence, it does imply max. possibilities for connectedness
------------------
[This message has been edited by Mr. Robin (edited December 13, 2001).]
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Alex:
It is extremely rude to the browsers of this forum to continue an argument that was started on another forum...
One must start anew, and deal only with content that is presented here.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Then please tell the person who is persistantly acted as to be nothing more then a pest to stop dreaming that he knows "all of my tactics" (I do not use tactics, other then simple honesty), acts from knowledge from other postings, but changes his words to reflect himself as something that he wasn't in the past, he has not really changed! thats clear.
I used the past postings, and referenced them to ensure anyone reading could find them if they so chose, because it is an amassing of evidence over time that reveals the nature of people, like figureing out Hannibals truer nature, it ain't all that difficult unless you preclude use of all of his words as you seem to wish to do.
He isn't letting go of anything, he persists in character attack, he should be known for just what he is, and that evidence is required to do that.
-
usually standing over a fox hole doesn't entice the fox to appear.
stepping away may expose the entrance to the hole and give the fox comfort to exit.
this will be my final post on this thread.
------------------
~~share some greased tea with me~~
General Philosophy
Discuss This...
The Acropolis
-
Mr. Robin.
I have not been able to digest your very long post as of yet.
I nibble at the corners but cannot commit to it's entirety.
I have mulled transferring your comments and hannibals comments onto a new topic post.
After you spent so much time creating the post, it would be evil of me to "dismiss it" or delete it.
But I don't think it relates to the orginal topic post.
Putting it under a new topic may be the perfect solution...If I do that, I'll try to come up with a decent title.
I just thought I'd pass on my mulling thoughts, it's not actually a top priority at this moment in time...but I'd thought I'd share my current state of mind.
------------------
Alex
